Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BE FORWARD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BE FORWARD[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from being written in a promotional tone, two of the three sources cited are primary (one paid advertising). Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG Flat Out (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, promo puff piece. Kierzek (talk) 02:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as I found nothing better to suggest better improvement other than these News links. SwisterTwister talk 06:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.