Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDAMD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BDAMD[edit]

Non-notable esoteric programming languages. Belongs on http://www.esolangs.org/wiki/Main_Page not on Wikipedia. —Ruud 22:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —Ruud 22:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "Non-notability" is not a reason to delete (WP:DEL). By this reasoning we should delete Millersburg, Michigan and some thousand other User:Rambot contributions. --ZeroOne 23:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As it is almost a trivial task to create an esoteric language for any computer scientist or skilled programmer there are hundreds of them out there and there is no way we can include them all in Wikipedia while upholding our article quality standards and WP:V, therefore we should only include the notable languages such as Intercal, Brainfuck and Befunge. If you look over the AfD page you will notice that notability certainly is a criterium for inclusion for the same reasons as I just gave. Cheers, —Ruud 23:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Ruud -- Chris 73 | Talk 00:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 03:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dubious notability and just a stub (improvements to either might change my mind, though). --bmills 03:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.