Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAYADA Home Health Care

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 18:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BAYADA Home Health Care[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

International company with hardly any significant coverage except for local newspapers. The businessweek.com ref seems to carry the most weight, but that is merely a description of the company, no coverage. Note that this article seems to be the result of paid editing, not necessarily that it is deemed notable and needs an article. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 03:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Based on the references, they appear to be a major company in the field. Realistically, that's the best criterion, since we could interpret hte sources as meeting or not meeting the subtantiality requirements of the GNG depending on what conclusion we thought sensible. DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP. this company is based in Philadelphia yet its major newspaper only yields 2 small hits on this company. [1]. LibStar (talk) 23:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Bayada is a very large Home Health Care company and has very deep ties that started in the PA/NJ area. The references are solid and factual based on what I know about the company and I feel that people can get value from this article and vote to keep it. abiondo ( talk ) 10:27, 04 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

— abiondo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

WP:IKNOWIT not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 08:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The size, scope and reliable and verifiable sources about the company satisfy the notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 16:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is sufficient coverage to build a well-referenced article. Clearly sufficient for WP:GNG Pichpich (talk) 00:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.