Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B4U Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to B4U Movies . —SpacemanSpiff 20:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B4U Pictures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concerned with tone and notability - quite a few edits by MrRohanM «(also created by him)» and socks, including «two recent edits from» TheRoyTheMan (who I suspect to be a sock too given his editing interests). However, this is better than most of the articles I AFD to me – but I'm no expert in Bollywood film. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 21:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (timestamp for additions in «» brackets: 21:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~- Has a notable parent company. But by itself doesn't seem to be notable. It has distributed some movies in the United Kingdom. I have stubbed the article because the creator has deliberately inserted hoaxes and i don't trust the other information he has put in as well. Will change vote to keep if RS can be found for the production credits--Sodabottle (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect MQS is right. Redirecting "B4U Pictures" and "B4U Productions" (which is a current redirect to B4UPictures) to either B4U (network) or B4U Movies would be useful rather than a delete.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note I've moved to classify User:TheRoyTheMan as a Rohan Malik sock at SPI. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 18:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Update TheRoyTheMan has been indefinitely blocked. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 21:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect the name "B4U Pictures" to B4U Movies as a reasonable search term. Despite the colorful history of the author, the simple redirect of a likely search term seems a given to me. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to B4U Movies, which appears to be the same entity.--Pink Bull 19:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.