Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bárbara Gil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 19:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bárbara Gil[edit]

Bárbara Gil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable actress. Quis separabit? 19:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This article isn't well-sourced, but she has a lengthy filmography (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0317731/) and seems to have been a pretty well-known telenovela actress. I'm turning up several articles in English and Spanish about her death, and plenty of biographies. I'd say she passes muster for WP:N. Fuzchia (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It just needs an expert.--Musa Talk  21:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Likely keep as most Mexican actresses will have gotten coverage one way or another and this is from the 1950s so chances are there are some somewhere. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per these GNews results (As I'm obviously not a Mexican speaker I wouldn't have a clue whether they're relevent or not!). –Davey2010Talk 19:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - passes WP:NACTOR, although the article could use more and better sources. Onel5969 TT me 13:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.