Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B&W mPower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rlendog (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B&W mPower[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no citations, from May 2010. This needs to have citations, as they are either outdated or useless. Payppp (talk) 23:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Delete or merge part that is or can be verified to (not sure yet) if sourcing doesn't improve by the time this AFD is closed. There is improvement so I change to "keep" tho a merge is not out of question.TMCk (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article has been changed significantly since the nomination. Right now it contains enough reliable sources to establish the notability of the object of this article. I would kindly ask the nominator to re-consider his/her nomination. Beagel (talk) 11:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Beagel, since there are now reliable citations. Strongly recommend that it be further cleaned up and more citations added, but it's now at the point of needing additional citations, not all citations. - Jorgath (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It currently has enough reliable sources to establish notability. Rorshacma (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.