Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aztecing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aztecing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable neologism; can't find any coverage in reliable and/or mainstream sources. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 12:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

maybe keep/stub Searching for this makes it clear that this is a term-of-art for modellers of sci-fi/techno vehicles and machines. I didn't find any book references but it looks to me as though it's just a matter of time. Mangoe (talk) 14:43, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON and WP:DICDEF. If Mangoe is right, RS will appear soon enough. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep This is sci-fi as technology is upgrading and we're facing the future up ahead. TruPepitoM Talk To Me 02:38, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Term has currency in the sci-fi modeling community but doesn't appear to have any coverage in reliable sources, at least not yet. No prejudice against a properly sourced recreation in future. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Here's what I can find.
- Specs of a model at a pet store website. Not reliable.
- TrekWeb.com discussion board on the Enterprise. Not reliable.
- A how-to guide on AllExperts. Not reliable either.

The rest of the results are similar things. Some how-to guides, forums and blogs, but absolutely no coverage in anything I'd consider a reliable source. It's probably a real term in the modeling community, but it hasn't attracted any significant coverage in reliable sources and hence fails WP:GNG. --Batard0 (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.