Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azadeh Moaveni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Azadeh Moaveni

Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Azadeh Moaveni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Azadeh Moaveni is a non-notable person failing WP:BIO. Sadra2010 (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I disagree. Azadeh is a notable person. She is a respected journalist and published author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.178.135 (talk) 05:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I also respectfully disagree. Ms. Azadeh Moaveni has published articles in the Washington Post, served as Time Magazine Middle East correspondent, and been interviewed by Mother Jones. My family and I will happily hear the lovely Azadeh Moaveni's presentation on her perspectives of Iran on Feb. 25, 2009, at the Jewish Community Center of San Francisco, which hosts highly notable speakers. I vote against deletion.

DonL (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

• Keep. Here are a few of the many sources available: [1][2][3][4]. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

• Keep per Phil. The subject is noteworthy and appears as a topic in several sources like The Economist and The Washington Post. Majoreditor (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.