Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayyavazhi (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 08:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ayyavazhi (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage by independent sources per WP:NF, deproded without addressing concerns BOVINEBOY2008 13:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't find any coverage in RS. NickCT (talk) 13:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Major mainstream film with top name stars, most of whom have Wikipedia entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, User:Roman Spinner, notability is not inherited, please read WP:NOTINHERITED. I have seen that you were directed to also read WP:NINI and WP:GNG in another AfD, but appears you have not. Films must be judged based on their own merit. Who appears in them, who directs them, and whether or not there are Wikipedia articles on the English Wikipedia for those actors/crewmembers, or an article on the film on another language's Wikipedia are all arguments that have no merit in a deletion discussion. Therefore, unless you can provide reviews to this film, or other coverage on the film that passes WP:NFILM, I am afraid that your Keep comment will be ignored by any admin closing this discussion as you have not addressed the concerns of the notability of this film adequately. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it is indeed a major mainstream film then where is the significant coverage and where are the multiple reviews that one would expect? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. Kolma8 (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.