Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aysmmetric Video Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Asymmetry#Other uses. KTC (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except "Aysmmetric Video Game" is a worthless title due to the misspelling and capitalization; this should have been moved before AfD'ing. I've moved it all (the redirect, the deleted revisions and the talk page) to "Asymmetric video game" and left the closure result as it was (delete then redirect). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aysmmetric Video Game[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an original essay. No sources given and thus no way to determine if this is a valid and notable concept. PROD declined without explanation by an IP. Safiel (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, the article is simply an essay on a topic that doesn't appear to have any reliable secondary sources as far as I can find. Nwlaw63 (talk) 01:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. The article as it stands is completely unsourced, which isn't acceptable for a wikipedia article. PeterTheFourth (talk) 01:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blow it up and start over, or if nobody's willing to reasearch and write a sources stub on the topic yet, delete this then redirect Asymmetric video game to Asymmetry#Other uses where it is covered -- The topic is something I've been looking forward to reading our coverage of (Category:Asymmetrical multiplayer video games wikilinks to asymmetry and multiplayer video game) but the convergence of both aspects is a unique concept that has been garnering growing coverage amongst the industry [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Definitely something that can be written about with some minimal effort. But "Aysmmetric" is a mess beyond redemption. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.