Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayman Mansour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 21:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ayman Mansour[edit]

Ayman Mansour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of sigcov Ficaia (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman, why is being an international player a reason to keep? Has a guideline been changed that I'm unaware of? –dlthewave 12:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My keep is also per WP:GNG and the sources identified below. gidonb (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:NSPORT is very clear on the fact that all athletes must have the significant coverage to pass the general notability guideline, regardless of any appearances for a national team, something that my fellow keep-!voters seem to be forgetting. That said, I feel that the subject passes WP:GNG with coverage such as this.[1][2][3][4] Alvaldi (talk) 19:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep International player, there are sources out there as evident per above. Govvy (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 34 caps for Egypt. Why do User:Dlthewave and User:Ficaia again, and again, fail to ever ever search for coverage of people who obviously are going to be notable and have significant coverage, WP:BEFORE nominating or voting. The references above (which long post-date his playing career) meet GNG. Nfitz (talk) 23:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ficaia: this is one you can close early since there is no support for deletion. Do you still think this should be deleted in light of the uncovered sources? Avilich (talk) 21:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.