Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayesha Asantewaa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if better sources can be found - see WP:GNG for guidelines on what "better" means here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ayesha Asantewaa[edit]

Ayesha Asantewaa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable disc jockey and radio presenter John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • While there are potentially valid notability claims being made here, in that BBC 1Xtra and CBBC are national services rather than local ones, this drops the ball for properly sourcing the claim — of the three sources here, one is a primary one, one is a Q&A-style interview in a "magazine" that looks for all the world more like a publicity platform for youth entrepreneurs than a real or neutral magazine, and the third is a dead link whose content is unverifiable. Even being a national radio or television host is not an inclusion freebie for an article that's this badly sourced. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can source it better than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 03:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.