Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayana Sumoto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:24, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ayana Sumoto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this actress under WP:GNG, no news entries at ANN, no sources at ja.wiki or via GWeb, GNews, Gbooks sources, no claims of notability under WP:ENT. I did attempt sourcing in English or Japanese but, of course, additional sources welcomed as always. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 02:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 02:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets the WP:ENTERTAINER. She played one of the two female characters in a notable erotic anime, Swallowtail Inn, that certainly a significant role. The character Maiko Kaneda was a significant role also in a different notable series, Discipline: The Hentai Academy, she featured in most episodes. Dream Focus 16:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing any reliable third-party sourcing here to verify notability. --DAJF (talk) 22:25, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: NN fancruft *Delete: Fancruft for a character in a marginally (at best) notable obscure anime. Toddst1 (talk) 04:57, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 16:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless sources are added. BLP articles must be properly sourced. Marokwitz (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:V requires that there be at least one reliable third-party source on the topic of each article, that criterion is not met here and as a core policy it overrules WP:ENT. I don't think there's anything in Japanese, as automated translation of some Google search results produced nothing and the corresponding entry in the Japanese Wikipedia is unreferenced. Hut 8.5 13:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In Japanese:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.