Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayaan Khan (actor)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. This is a strange one. Judging consensus as delete based on strength of arguments, specifically DreamRimmer's unchallenged analysis of available sources. Presence of discography in article is not an indication of notability one way or the other, for what it's worth. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayaan Khan (actor)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Ayaan Khan (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NACTOR nd WP:SINGER.... Artist discography not discribed in article Worldiswide (talk) 05:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Worldiswide Discography is described , you might have failed to understand WP:NACTOR the person has shown notability in multiple events. person is also honoured with union territory level titles by Lieutenant governor. Tintantuckle (talk) 09:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tintantuckle No discography was displayed in the article until the article was nominated afd. And find out whether taking union territory level titles indicates notability? nd What about WP:SINGER? Worldiswide (talk) 09:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Worldiswide it means you are saying that the discography if not mentioned does not exist? before nominating the article for deletion, you could have checked on available sources if it existed or not, it clearly indicates that you put the article for deletion just by seeing it missed out on discography, the page was recently created, reviewed and had ongoing contributions to add all the information including the missing. Yes, the awards should indicate notability as a secondary mention. Tintantuckle (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Was the review done before the article was created? what do you mean... i do not understand how you are showing the criteria of both wp:singer and wp:nactor ... i think work is needed on this Worldiswide (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tintantuckle I removed more then 5 unreliable sources. and now 1, 2 both mid day sources look like brand desk/ paid contant...you should work on it Worldiswide (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Worldiswide I would really like to know how you decided Latestly and Iwmbuzz are unreliable sources? also I do not understand how you are showing that this article fails the criteria for wp:singer and wp:nactor? the fact that if some information is missing instead of improving or researching you put articles for deletion by your own decision, I believe a thorough research is needed before nominating articles for deletion. please explain how the person fails the criteria for both? Tintantuckle (talk) 13:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tintantuckle I had removed some unreliable sources, you have added them back to the article. You need to read wiki project hindi movie. If you think it is worth mainspace then wait for afd result (Do not answer this) Worldiswide (talk) 02:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Worldiswide wait, you haven't explained why you think it fails both criteria? you have to be clear in details so that others who join the discussion really know what's actually wrong with the page, a one-liner doesn't actually explain it well. Tintantuckle (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:SIGCOV arguably met, searched and found multiple reliable sources, the person has received recognition on a state level and titles also as per sources. Shivangi1738 (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Shivangi1738 which reliable sources? .. spacify Worldiswide (talk) 02:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:29, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Only the TOI seems to be a reliable source on this. YouTube and Facebook links aren't considered credible sources. This article does not yet meet WP:NACTOR since the Midday and Outlook sources mentioned here are plainly branded postings that fall under the category of public relations. He hasn't performed on any significant projects as a singer; hence, this article also doesn't cover WP:NSINGER. DreamRimmer (talk) 05:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per DreamRimmer due to lack of reliable sources on the subject of the article. 33ABGirl (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ayaan_Khan_(actor)&oldid=1158509797"