Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayşegül Coşkun

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ayşegül Coşkun[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Ayşegül Coşkun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As an actor or singer does not have the necessary fame. A credible source has not addressed this person and his works have not received much attention from the media and sources. Needs further investigation. Persia ☘ 11:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Motarab Motreb is not the best-selling film in Iran.
  • There is no source in the article related to hamshahrionline in the article.
  • This person was not present in the original version of Behet Ghol Midam, and when Behet Ghol Midam was one of the most popular songs in Iran
  • The Persian sources that have dealt with this person are not reliable sources
    • etemadonline - Only one photo and one headline have been worked on and the news is about a project for the future and has not been made yet
    • borna - Collaborating with this person on Behet Ghol Midam is more about the song itself.

--Persia ☘ 12:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to lie, some Turkish sources, with the exception of a few interviews, look good. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 12:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
tr:Ayşegül Coşkun was deleted in 30 January 2020, two years ago, and not even for being not-notable. Criteria M8 implies that articles may be deleted if they are not written in wikicode and if the article either has a lot of false information or isn't in Turkish. Criteria M6 would be the red flag (non-notable), but that isn't the case here. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 14:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Motarab [sic] is not the best-selling film in Iran. See List of highest-grossing Iranian films for yourself. The nominator is just lying and abusing language barrier. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That movie is still running. And you are missing the point. Being the first or the second, what's the difference here? You can't deny that Motreb was highly popular in Iran and was a success at box office. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep based solely on my analysis of Turkish sources. The Önce Vatan source is an interview, and cannot be used to establish notability. Haber61 isn't reliable, and I still stand by my comment made here regarding "Kimdir?" sources. The Akşam source is also an interview. Milliyet is reliable and independent, but this particular source consist of a single sentence, which is far from significant. The Sabah source is reliable and independent, and meets the bare minimum requirement of being significant, which I think is four sentences. The Hürriyet source is without a doubt the best of all: reliable, independent and significant. It does repeat what she says in one paragraph, but the remaining seven sentences are enough. Gazete Vatan is reliable and independent, however the source only consists of three sentences, one of which repeats the subject. I won't make a comment on Persian sources, as they are written in a different script that I do no not understand, but I guess it's fair to assume that there is at least one good source? Though again, my !vote is only based on what I see from Turkish sources without including this assumption. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 14:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Styyx: Thanks for your useful comment. I found other Turkish sources too: 1 from Star, 2 about her music by magazinci.com, 3 from Hürriyet, 4 and 5 from Milliyet, 6 from Posta, 7, and 8. These must be enough for you to change your !vote from "weak keep" to "keep". But if you are still unsure, I will try to find other Turkish sources. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What the text in bold says isn't actually that much important as long as the provided argument makes sense. However with the second Hürriyet source above, I think this is a clear GNG pass. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 18:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep based on arguments provided by Styyx and 4nn1l2 Mujinga (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, google translate of the Persian sources suggests WP:SIGCOV exists there, in addition to the Turkish sources noted by Styyx. BilledMammal (talk) 17:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Styyx. --Kadıköylü (talk) 22:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are significant coverage in Persian and Turkish language about her film in collaboration with Iranian actors. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ayşegül_Coşkun&oldid=1071243764"