Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axiom (WALL-E)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Axiom (WALL-E)[edit]

Prod and prod2 were removed by creating user without adding any further information, so bringing this to AfD. This is a very minor piece of trivia from a movie, no assertion of notability is made nor are any sources referenced. Ryanjunk (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete, there's an entry in Axiom (disambiguation) with a link to the movie. That has everything that is at this article. move along, nothing to see. RJFJR (talk) 14:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete as non-notable. It's a redirect candidate at best but, I think that is covered by the dab page. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete. non-notable movie cruft. A redirect is not needed as the disambig covers it. Tavix (talk) 15:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as prod-2 placer. Non-notable minor character. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per RJFJR. Information already available and does not need its own "sentence" parading as an article. Schmidt (talk) 17:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to WALL-E. Tharnton345 (talk) 18:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable, zero content to merge anywhere. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – agree with nom and previous comments. Non-notable film character with no merging needed to be done, based on the lack of literal information or content. As Tavix and others said, the disambig page already covers it well enough. Jamie^☆S93 22:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - dab page entry is just right. (Have tidied it, and removed a "Popular culture" section from Axiom, which only consisted of this same info!) PamD (talk) 15:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this topic does not transcend the film itself; all information about the ship, in-universe or out-of-universe, can be conveyed at the film article. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:27, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no further comment.it's all been said.Toyokuni3 (talk) 04:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.