Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axentis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 21:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Axentis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one just deserves a wide audience. Unambiguous advertisement for a software provider of on-demand, enterprise governance, risk and compliance (GRC) management solutions. But now we know why these "management solutions" are described in the vaguest possible terms. This one says too much, and is interesting:

The company’s flagship product, AXENTIS Enterprise, enables customers to implement risk-driven compliance programs that incorporate all Elements of an Effective Compliance and Ethics program as defined by the U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

<boggle> Software to pre-emptively keep businessmen from doing anything that will enhance their sentence when convicted in a U.S. federal court. God bless America!

This just might be the sort of story that is of interest to real news media, but is the sort of thing that the US media tends to avoid. The current article is referenced only to routine analyst reports and dead links, and I see nothing better. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not for promotion WP:PROMOTION WP:NONSENSE. Msnicki (talk) 21:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of notable mentions. I didn't find any notable sources on both Google and Yahoo!, Wikipedia is not a hosting service because that's what GoDaddy is for instead. SwisterTwister talk 04:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.