Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axel Steen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Axel Steen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, doesn't seem likely that his rank meets our notability criteria Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not even a field officer as claimed. Rank equivalent to second lieutenant. Probably a family history article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Yes, the creator was AxelSteen who has made no other contributions apart from an unsourced link to this article elsewhere, which I reverted Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If he were notable - would be for WP:CRIMINAL - for murder-suicide of his wife which left a young baby which was then found by others and adopted - or alternatively for treason (against Norway of which he was a citizen). Not notable as a soldier. But at current sourcing level - it is a definite delete - I wasn't able to find anything substantive in a quick search.Icewhiz (talk) 11:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.