Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axamenta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was CSD#g7, author requested here. (non-admin closure) Terrillja _talk 04:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Axamenta[edit]

Doesn't meet any of the criteria of WP:BAND, signed to a label, but neither label has a wiki article, and a google search confirms that the LSP Company does not appear to be notable. This fails 2 records from a major label, all current and former members are redlinked, sources are either selfpublished or not WP:RS. Terrillja _talk 18:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I found no mention of them in English language newspapers. The documentation does seem to be lacking. --Bejnar (talk) 13:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: article fails to establish notability WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 04:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I have decided that I can handle this being deleted. I, the creator of the Axamenta article, recognize that it comes short of wikipedia guidelines, and most or all the people viewing the article are probably thinking to themselves that this should be deleted. Well, I guess this was one of those articles I created that just didn't have the notability to make it passed the first few days, just like the article I made for the band Bergthron, which was speedily deleted. Their vocalist recently quit the band due to throat problems. If the band finds a replacement that is notable enough to have created or have a previously created article, then I might try again to create this article. If they sign on to a record label notable enough to have a wikipedia article (or if Shiver Records, their current label, has a wikipedia article, but the notability of that is irrelevant in this discussion, except for the fact that it's not notable enough), then I will probably try again. So, I acknowledge that this article wasn't meant to last, and I will give the administrators and anyone else who can delete articlesto delete the Axamenta article (I don't know if there are any non-administrators who can delete articles, but I put that just in case). Thank you. BT^C 00:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.