Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awthaw (25°16'0"N 95°'13"E)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awthaw (25°16'0"N 95°'13"E)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NGEO as the only source is a mimu database on my:အော်သော်ရွာ၊_ယက်ဖ showing this does exist as a village separate from the other Awthaw, but not that it is populated. Only source on English wiki does not show the village anymore. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 19:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The name of the village is also listed in a Region Map from MIMU (May 2023 edition). Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 04:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for that source, I see this Awthaw there- unfortunately maps do not demonstrate notability still (WP:NGEO). EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 13:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete this and, well, seemingly every other Burmese populated place stub. Those which I looked at were all sourced to GMaps and Bing Maps, or Maplandia, none of which is remotely a reliable source. We have nothing here which would satisfy even the current bad version of WP:GEOLAND, much less GNG. Mangoe (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - just because it's on Google maps and in one (unreliable) gazette, a place is not automatically notable. This appears to be a very small village that is perhaps abandoned, which I have long considered to be not notable. Bearian (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.