Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Away mission

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Away mission[edit]

The result was Redirecting to Away team under WP:SNOW. Morwen - Talk 13:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Total, unapologetic original research. I thought about a merger into Redshirt or Away team, but there does not seem to be anything worth saving in this article, which violates Wikipedia is not for things forwarded in e-mails. JChap2007 02:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as or and unsource nonsense. meshach 02:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't know what this really is, but it looks more like a jaded essay about the flaws of every away mission in Star Trek. --Dennisthe2 03:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 04:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete In-universe OR cruft bollocks. Most depressingly, this has been here for two and a half years [1]. -- IslaySolomon | talk 05:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redshirt away mission and redirect to away team. --Dhartung | Talk 05:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. delldot | talk 08:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with phasers on kill. SkierRMH,10:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete poorly written second-person non-npov. Anything salvageable in here (although I don't see any) should be merged with away team or some such. --EEMeltonIV 15:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to away team WilyD 16:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Set phasers to redirect per WilyD FirefoxMan 16:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tactical Nuke from Orbit as externally unverified, OR material that belongs at an Evil Overlord List, not in a Wikipedia article at this time. Support recreation as redirect to away team. -- saberwyn 21:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any reason I shouldn't just redirect this to away team and speedily close this? Morwen - Talk 00:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, deleting anything relating to Star Trek is likely to generate much hand-waving, combined with trips to deletion review and WP:AN, causing needless wikidrama. Better to just let this run its course so it will be harder to undelete. The AfD can run the full five days without causing us to miss our deadline, which is never. JChap2007 00:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care to get involved in further drama right now, but the article really is indefensible at the moment. Do we really want to waste our time with this? I'll give it til tomorrow and then redirect under WP:SNOW. Morwen - Talk 00:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Set phasers on kill. Delete and then redirect to away team. (And I am a trekkie. According to reports, my wife and I appeared in Trekkies 2.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 03:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.