Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awami Raaj Tahreek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Anoptimistix "Message Me" 04:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awami Raaj Tahreek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Greenbörg (talk) 09:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep This appears to be the "Awaami Raj Party" created by MNA Jamshed Dasti. In that case, and the coverage available, it meets notability. Mar4d (talk) 10:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited. Namechecking doesn't make one org notable. We can redirect the page to its founder. Greenbörg (talk) 10:34, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tahreek (تحریک) in Urdu means "movement". The current WP article does not even mention Jamshed Dasti, i.e. the founder of the Awami Raaj Party. Besides, I could not find any explicit reference to Awami Raaj Tahreek in the article's sources. Looks like a dud to me. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 10:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Gist of my previous comment: this is not the "Awaami Raj Party". 84.73.134.206 (talk) 06:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 04:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.