Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avi Belkin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Avi Belkin[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Avi Belkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficiently notable per WP:BIO Sonnenradical (talk) 13:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, almost too early in his career. Oaktree b (talk) 15:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment After creating this nomination, I noticed that the article was created and substantially edited by User:Belkinavi who is likely the subject of the article. So, in addition to the already mentioned notability concerns, there is also COI (Which of course is not, in itself a grounds for deletion). I noted this on the article's talk page as well Sonnenradical (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom + the possible COI especially because of WP:TOOSOON. BJackJS talk 19:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete very clearly a non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have cleaned up the article from any puff, COI, and excessive information. gidonb (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable, award-winning filmmaker. I have added info and sources. No grounds for deletion.--Geewhiz (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets WP:DIRECTOR #3 and the WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 04:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to Speedy keep. Nominator created a dormant, double blank (user/talk_user) account in February 2019. On 15 December 2020, nom started and finished editing with the immediate nomination of just one single article and a COI comment on its talk page and here. Never touched anything but Avi Belkin. As I mentioned above, the nomination intro does not hold water. Even more about this nomination seems wrong. gidonb (talk) 04:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Meanwhile, the nominator has been blocked. Was a sockpuppet of a well-known sockpuppeteer. gidonb (talk) 05:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Multiple RS articles on each of his last two movies, meets GNG. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 20:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.