Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Find
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ava Find[edit]
- Ava Find (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no article. Miami33139 (talk) 10:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Has a CNET review [1], which was listed under "external liks", but it really is a 3rd party reference. Probably more can be found. Pcap ping 11:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A small review on CNET, but I couldn't find much else for it. In the scheme of things it doesn't seem to have a particularly large number of downloads. Quantpole (talk) 11:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to locate significant coverage in reliable sources beyond the one aforementioned CNet review. --Cybercobra (talk) 17:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.