Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Devine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ava Devine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and GNG. Scene awards no longer count towards inclusion. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - won of ANX Award, Complex magazine ranked her at #40 in their list of "The Top 50 Hottest Asian Porn Stars of All Time", 17x interwiki!!!!, well known in world.... Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 16:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above - fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No claim the subject meets PORNBIO. No independent reliable sourcing. No nontrivial biographical content. The "lady of the lake" AVN reference is surpassingly ludicrous, demonstrating the general cluelessness of the commenter and the failure of AVN to have minimal editorial standards regarding reliability on subjects that won't get them sued. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO with only a scene-related award win. Making one of Complex magazine's lists of hottest porn stars also doesn't establish notability. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Even if you count the Hannah Harper AVN column as semi-reliable (I don't), it's not enough. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails PORNBIO and GNG, #40 in a list compiled by an obscure magazine and only in-trade coverage can not establish notability Kraxler (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.