Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autonomy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. – Rob ert 00:20, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autonomy[edit]

Transwiki - Dictionary Definition - as such, it belongs in wiktionary, not wikipedia. Michael Ralston 19:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. An article on the political science meaning of the term could certainly be written. Alternatively this could be reworked into a disambig page. - SimonP 19:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SimonP. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SimonP. dbtfz ^talk 02:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a mature and useful disambiguation page that combines a number of explanations that could be expanded, but which are currently stubs. Eleven other Wikipedias include an article on this subject, so it's hardly un-notable. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 04:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per 373 backlinks and 11 transwikis. Even if the current content needs work, apparently a number of people think something belongs here, and the current content certainly has at least a little utility. --Interiot 05:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Just expand it. It doesn't have to be a definition page. -Justin (koavf), talk 02:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SimonP. -Maxwell Kramer 19:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep its a disambig page and then some. Cool3 00:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.