Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic (Gary Numan album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure NAHID 18:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic (Gary Numan album)[edit]

This may not meet wikipedia's notability criteria Quanticle (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable album by a notable artist(s). Would have been reviewed a lot when it came out, which was too early for these reviews to be easily found on the web.--Michig (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The artist is notable according to WP:NMG as has had a hit on a national music chart (taking the artist as either Gary Numan or Sharpe and Numan) and been the subject of non-trivial published works. This means studio albums by the artist are also notable. -- JD554 (talk) 09:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per above. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable as per WP:NMG. Bad faith nom? Lugnuts (talk) 18:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletions. —JD554 (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per precedent that albums by notable artists are inherently notable enough for their own articles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or delete wikipedia into irrelevance. Mykej (talk) 19:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable album by notable musical artist. Mh29255 (talk) 21:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above. From the description, it sounds like a terrible record though. sparkl_!sm ^hey! 21:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.