Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoflower Cup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 06:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autoflower Cup[edit]

Autoflower Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. It appears that a sock of User:Expertwikiguy created this. Chisisi Handal (talk) 15:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP I am the creator of the page. The subject has enough coverage to meet the WP:GNG policies of Wikipedia. Googleboywonder (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This deletion should be struck because this nominator is a sock. Obviously a new user would not know how to immediately nominate a page for deletion and have so much knowledge of Wikipedia policies, so he must be a sock. And yet he is accusing me of being a sock of a random other user without providing any details on how he came to this conclusion. He even posted a message on my talk page, as if he is a super experienced editor, maybe impersonating admins. He only opened his account to get this page deleted. Googleboywonder (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Comment struck as user has been blocked for block evasion. - Bilby (talk) 04:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just to confirm User:Googleboywonder, do you have a COI related to Autoflower Cup? - Indefensible (talk) 01:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for PROMO. All links to this thing are PR items, including Yahoo Finance [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 22:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete possibly TOOSOON. The international contest is only 3 years old and the US one was first held this year. I find no independent sources that are substantially about the event. This is a bit hard to judge because nearly all of the sources are from the cannabis industry and even those are pretty immature. I did not see any that I could say fit our vision of a "reliable source." Lamona (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The article refers to dubious websites or press releases. At times, the text looks like an advertisement. --Wyndhan Han (talk) 11:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.