Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auto Da Fe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Black Kite 02:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auto Da Fe[edit]

No mention of any awards for this band or any other indication of notability. Orphaned and contains no references. Rtphokie (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and disambiguate with Auto de fe. amazon.co.uk has two of their CDs available. Pburka (talk) 01:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment availability of a CD does not establish notability. This article fails WP:MUSIC. No mention of charting or awards. No references to coverage in reliable media.--Rtphokie (talk) 02:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Well, it does pass WP:MUSIC criteria #6, but I'm not sure it should be kept as a separate article. Maybe merge to Gay Woods. Torc2 (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Availability of a CD on amazon typically indicates that it was released on a largish label. Pburka (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've found enough to expand the article. They pass WP:MUSIC, and there should definitely be an article here.--Michig (talk) 10:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge per Torc2. Definitely passes #6.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes (at least) points 2 and 6 of WP:MUSIC. - fchd (talk) 08:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.