Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Author Jeff Benjamin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:39, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Author Jeff Benjamin[edit]

Unclear that this author is of any significance. Urjeff 16:53, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This reads like a copyvio, and author only has two books, one of which is self-published. --howcheng [ talk  contribs  web ] 17:21, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Keep. If the copyvio and general quality of the article improve it may stay. I don't think that the number of books one has published should be a criterion for inclusion. Chelman 17:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Number of books is one of only two criteria for establishing notability in an author (the other is sales). Doesn't appear to meet either. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 17:49, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete although I think the disclosure of his Zodiac sign is far out. Gets points from me on humor (I have a weakness for those born under Taurus). Stu 22:34, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and Redvers. Also apparently vanity; edit summary for creation of article is "By Jeff Benjamin". MCB 00:11, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as NN vanitycruft. - Sensor 00:34, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. -- NSLE _{(Communicate!)} ^<Contribs> 09:58, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.