Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austyn Moore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Austyn Moore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails pornbio and gng. The award win was a listener's choice award for a radio station she worked for and isnt a major award either, Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails pornbio & gng. –Davey2010^Talk 22:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Adam_&_Eve_(company)#Pornographic_film_studio, which is the section detailing some of Adam & Eve's past contract stars. Without having done a large amount of research about the subject under consideration here, one of Ms. Moore's most significant accomplishments appears to have been her apparent brief stint as a contract star with Adam & Eve. Guy1890 (talk) 03:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 15:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO without significant award wins. A KSEX in-house award is not major. Fails GNG. Most significant RS coverage is a paragraph in a Fox News article. Other mainstream coverage consists of passing mentions. Porn industry press consists of interviews and republished press releases. Not enough. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No serious support for retaining an individual article. We don't redirect NN authors to publishers they happen to have written for, NN actors to studios the've done unimportant work for, or NN local politicians to the town they live in. No basis for special favorable treatment for porn performer names. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 14:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.