Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian banks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There's no sense in keeping this debate open when a simple redirect to the existing article will suffice. --cj | talk 04:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australian banks[edit]

does not add anything that is not already in Category:Banks of Australia Jon513 13:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It simply is not correct that this article does not add anyhting to the catgory. The very first sentence adds something. Let it develop the history of banks in Australia. Give it a chance. --Bduke 16:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Change the name if kept. Pavel Vozenilek 23:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand as encylopedic topic. Possibly rename to Banks of Australia. I am surprised that we don't have an article on this topic already. Capitalistroadster 03:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Err, we do. Banks of Australia is a daughter of Financial system in Australia. Would anyone object to me simply closing this AfD and redirecting the article?--cj | talk 04:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. It's common sense.--cj | talk 04:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.