Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Quarterly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Quarterly[edit]

I had this up for speedy but it does assert notoriety and the creator keeps removing the CSD notice, so I thought I would bring it to afd. To me this publication fails to meet WP:N. meshach (talk) 02:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC) I did not realize that a different user removed the tag the second time. The source is enough for me, I withdraw the nom. meshach (talk) 04:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This publication is notable enough to be used as a resource in some American universities. This page [1] alone should convince you. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 02:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Australian Quarterly is such a long running publication, it surprises me that the article is up for deletion. Maybe the article could be improved a bit, but it should not be deleted. Many famous Australian politicians have contributed to Australian Quarterly. You may agree or disagree with the content in Australian Quarterly, or the politicians and commentators who wrote in it, but the publication has a rather historic significance in Australia.Lester 03:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep clearly notable. JJL (talk) 03:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Notable journal. I looked in the library catalogs of three universities in the U.S., and all three of them subscribe or have subscribed to this journal. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable. Note that I, not the creator removed the speedy tag the second time. Dsmdgold (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.