Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia Unemployment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nick-D (talk) 06:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Australia Unemployment[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no sources and is not really even about unemployment in Australia. Even if the article is not deleted, it will almost certainly end up being merged. Besides all this, the article is very confusing. Writing Enthusiast ^☎ 01:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - unsourced and incoherent. Any actual article under this title (which should probably be at Unemployment in Australia anyway) would simply duplicate various articles we already have including White Paper on Full Employment in Australia, Economy of Australia and various others. St★lwart¹¹¹ 03:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete blatant original research. LibStar (talk) 08:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for speedy deletion for lack of context. Alexius08 (talk) 09:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.