Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia–Montenegro relations (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 11:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Australia–Montenegro relations[edit]

Australia–Montenegro relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted. Fails WP:GNG. There's not much to these relations, no embassies, no evidence of agreements or state visits. According to this, bilateral trade was only A$268,000 in 2014-15. LibStar (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Montenegro, and Australia. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Thought there could have been something defense related since Montenegro joined NATO, but no. Found a paper that confirms that trade is at $0.3 million dollars, the smallest import-export partner of Australia in the (Western) Balkans. Just not a notable relationship. Pilaz (talk) 01:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of coverage in reliable sources. Yilloslime (talk) 15:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.