Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australasian Wrestling Federation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. /ƒETCH COMMS / 03:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australasian Wrestling Federation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable promotion with no third party sources. Created by account that appears suspicious. Could well be an advertising effort. Ultra X987 (talk) 12:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Fails WP:NSPORTS. Sources provided do not provide significant coverage of this organization. A search for other sources doesn't come up with much, therefore fails WP:N.Auseplot (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 03:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per this guideline, professional wrestling is considered as entertainment not sport. Treating the article under WP:ORG, it fails notability as "the Federation" has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. WWGB (talk) 03:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, yet another two bit wrestling promotion. Note that while the article creator has a clear WP:COI, that in itself is not a reason for deletion (since it was alluded to by the nominator). Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:05, 15 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete -- No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 17:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Based on the timing of the account creation and the actions of the account (strong push to delete articles about Australian wrestling promotions and remove promotions from List of professional wrestling promotions, and a knowledge of the deletion history of Madison Eagles--strange knowledge for a new editor, but it would make sense if this was a sockpuppet, as Justa Punk created the AfD for that article), I would bet that this is a new incarnation of Justa Punk and would recommend a checkuser if possible before closing this discussion. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.