Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Villa (Panyu)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete lacks sources to establish notability. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Villa (Panyu)[edit]

Unnotable gated community in China. See here and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Garden (Shenyang) for precedent cases. Poeloq (talk) 03:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Precedent cases are unconvincing; I see absolutely no evidence of anyone trying to look for sources in the language of the country where the development is actually located. ~~Sources for this one: Nanfang Daily [1], Ming Pao [2], Sina News [3].~~ cab (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, confused it with another development by a similar name (南天名苑) in the same city. Still looking for sources on this one. cab (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This one is called "名苑別墅" in Chinese; horribly generic name (and thus hard to search for), but searching for that + Panyu in Chinese [4] just gives real estate agents' websites, not any actual news about the place. Many of these large developments in China are notable (e.g. the one I found by accident above, or Country Garden), but this one isn't. cab (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.