Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AustinFFA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AustinFFA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable YouTuber. No Google news results and less than a million subscribers. JDDJS (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article should not be deleted because i feel AustinFFA is a notable YouTuber with a lot of subscribers. He has been in Google News before, over his "First Time Doing *Drug*" criticism. I feel that he has a very loyal fan-base and that some of the newer fans need to know more about him and get to know his channel better. This is why i believe his wikipedia page should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLGRektMaster2k16 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this better satisfies the applicable notability, nothing else convincing to keep. SwisterTwister talk 03:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per failure of WP:GNG, as being popular on Youtube does not mean you are notable in the real world. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 23:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- No coverage in reliable secondary sources, so therefore does not meet the notability criteria. In veritas (talk) 20:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.