Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auscamp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 11:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Auscamp[edit]

Delete. No assertion of notability for this outdoors company. Google returns 355. A relevant website shows it to be one of 21 of its kind in Australia and thus it does not appear to meet WP:CORP. If an Australian wants to inform that this is the biggest and best of its kind, I have no problem reconsidering. Marskell 08:05, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No indications that this camp company is notable enough to meet WP:CORP. 250 Google hits [1] and no Google News hits. [2]. Capitalistroadster 09:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. . Capitalistroadster 09:54, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- unless expanded to show notability. - Longhair 10:11, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ambi 12:30, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WP:CORP is absurdly harsh compared to the criteria for every other type of article and should be either updated or abandoned. I would estimate that well under 10% of the companies with articles meet it, but most of them would not get deleted if nominated. CalJW 18:13, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not much content, not notable. If more content was provided perhaps... --Computerjoe 19:04, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --Roisterer 09:38, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - contact is [email protected] - an ISP, not even it's own domain. NN. Josh Parris 06:16, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.