Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Helicopters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 06:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora Helicopters[edit]

Aurora Helicopters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Subject seems to be not significantly notable at all - the only information which can be found is about crash of one of their helicopters. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 21:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:GNG. This is a charter service that is not at all notable. Reads like an advert. WP:WWIN. Wikipedia is not a local grocery/pub bulletin board for ads for local services. SW3 5DL (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- advertorial content on an unremarkable helicopter charter service; no indications of notability or significance. Content belongs on the company web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Was a valid redirect at one time but not worth a stand alone article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.