Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aunt Rose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aunt Rose[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 16:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable straight to DVD production. Does not seem to have received any professional reviews. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, has at least one professional review, at Dread Central (a WP:RS), [[1]] Donaldd23 (talk) 17:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I can't remember if I missed that one when I was searching or if I saw it and didn't realise that it was a professional review. That said, if that is all we can find then I still think this is a delete. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reliable sources review listed above by Donaldd23. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NFILM requires more than just one review. Bearcat (talk) 19:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We only have one review, our guidelines require multiple reviews.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.