Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aughintober Pipe Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) -- Sam ^Sing! 19:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aughintober Pipe Band[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good enough reason for deletion - please be more specific. Article relates to an active pipe band, although does require updated. --Thehorseltd (talk) 22:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Grade 2 band, which means it is good, but not really significant on the competition scene, and there is almost no secondary coverage that I can find. Ostrichyearning (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Possibly notable - I can't find any older secondary coverage, but I'm probably not looking in the right places. Ostrichyearning (talk) 17:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

Keep Withdraw nom, will make effort to improve article. Ostrichyearning (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. makes adequate claims to notability and is not an easily sourced topic. Lack of sources is not necessarily alone a reason for deletion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Needs work, but makes some claims to notability. Just needs better sourcing, but that's not a reason to delete now.Korruski^Talk 14:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.