Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audiopinons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Audiopinons[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy the notability requirements for web content or the general notability guidelines. Sources given are either the subject site itself or obscure blog sites. None of the sources given appear to satisfy the requirement for reliable sources. PROD was declined by an IP, likely the article creator, with the explanation that he had added additional sources to establish notability. However, as stated above, none appear to be reliable sources. Safiel (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnotable music site with few fans or followers. Bad sources, shoddy writing, little information. Not important enough. Definetly delete. Guyinasuit5517 (talk) 05:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - appears to be a typo in the article name - should be Audiopinions. I've fixed the Find sources link above. An optimist on the run! 07:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable Wordpress blog. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 03:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm unable to find coverage in reliable sources for this site; it does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:WEB. Gongshow ^Talk 20:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.