Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audible audiobook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Audible audiobook[edit]

Transparent spam; whether or not the company itself is notable, this is not; we already have a proper audio book article. Delete. See also its twin spam article. Fourohfour 15:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is already an article about Audible.com. Mushroom (Talk) 15:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PJM 15:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blatant spam, which really should be a speedy criterion. Just zis Guy you know? 16:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Bucketsofg 21:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like an ad, Sounds like an ad, Smells like an ad... Inventm 02:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Blatant advertising. Plus there's already a real article at Audible.com. Plus it's not even a real trademark: it's a a statement of fact whether or not an audiobook is "audible". Peter Grey 08:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.