Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attractiveness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 04:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attractiveness[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a disaster of an article that's been a summary/WP:CFORK of Physical attractiveness or an attempt to describe "Eye candy" for the past 10 years. An attempt to soft-redirect to Wiktionary was reverted. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nominator has failed to give any substantial reasons for deletion. If an article is substandard, by all means, improve it. There is a similarity between Physical attractiveness and Attractiveness but the case that there's a fork is weak, and one might argue that the subject of attractiveness (clearly an encyclopedic topic) is broader and more encompassing than merely physical attractiveness and definitely deserves its own article.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The topic is valid and the article is decent.TH1980 (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The nominator hasn't given a valid reason for deletion. MBlaze Lightning 04:04, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.