Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AttoBasic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AttoBasic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by SPA. Can't find anything remotely independent and reliable to demonstrate notability. Borderline A7, but more eyes would be better for this technical article. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Any 21st century BASIC is going to have to be pretty exceptional to justify itself. This article looks more like an individual's lab book than an encyclopedic article based on 3rd party sources. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this software seems to be pretty significant in its field, though I can't find anything mentioning it that I could call a reliable source. It seems too niche-specific to attain general notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.