Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attentiv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 16:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attentiv[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Attentiv is a project by Go Fish Digital (see founders), a company that is known to be involved in undisclosed paid editing (a few sockpuppets already blocked, others still pending).
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BurritoSlayer/Archive#26 July 2018
Created by suspected (not confirmed) Go Fish Digital employee: Dmrwikiprof.
Later edited by suspected (not confirmed) Go Fish Digital sockpuppet: KomodoD.
Marked as reviewed by confirmed Go Fish Digital sockpuppet: BurritoSlayer [1]
De-PROD'd by confirmed Go FIsh Digital sockpuppet: BurritoSlayer [2]
About sources: 1 written by Kat Haselkorn, former Go Fish Digital employee and published at National Federation of Independent Business, an organization Go Fish Digital is affiliated with, 1 written by Sarah Haselkorn, likely Kat Haselkorn relative, all of them written shortly after Attentiv was featured at TechBUZZ conference in November 2015. No reliable sources over time that support notability. MarioGom (talk) 09:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nominator's comprehensive source analysis, these sources aren't independent reliable sources. So fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think WP:G11 quite applies, but the outcome is likely WP:SNOW. Even if notability is somehow achieved, there is a case for WP:TNT, though not a strong one.— Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per all of the above and the analysis by nom. Topic also fails GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.