Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Philippe 19:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation[edit]
- Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable book Myheartinchile (talk) 04:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - published book by a notable author --T-rex 04:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable book, with interesting history - by extremely notable author, Fichte. This is the book that made him famous. Along with the other traditional big four of German Idealism (Kant, Schelling and Hegel), he is of such stature that any major work deserves an article. Of course there is a lot written about it: 23 google book hits on the English title, and 241 on the original German "Versuch einer Critik aller Offenbarung". Works of even the less famous German Idealists have their own articles here. Haven't even bothered to check google and google scholar.John Z (talk) 05:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'm not sure how this could be considered a non-notable book. Being mistaken for a work by Kant would make it notable straight away, and the actual author is rather notable himself. Reyk YO! 05:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as an important piece of academic literature. Lastingsmilledge (talk) 03:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.