Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atkore International

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Atkore International[edit]

Atkore International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Might be notable, but right it miserably fails our basic requirements for verification of notability per the requirements for companies. Steven Walling • talk 09:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. I found a lot of press releases but very little in the way of independent coverage. --Michig (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys just wanted to revisit this...Atkore is now a publically traded company on the NYSE...are you sure it is not "noteworthy"? I think your previous criteria were very misguided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faypatri (talkcontribs) 13:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Delete - If there are many good ghits they're drowned by press releases. Seems to fail WP:ORG. They are, however, notable enough to have their press releases picked up by a number of otherwise reliable sources (Reuters, Wall Street Journal, etc.) -- but no independent coverage. --Rhododendrites (talk) 04:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.