Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atisuto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. A number of editors assert that this topic is notable, and some inline citations to weak-ish sources have been added during this AfD, but the rough consensus of experienced editors is that these aren't sufficient to retain this content in the mainspace. In deference to those who want to keep this around in some form, I'm going to move it to draftspace for incubation until it's properly sourced. You can find it here.—S Marshall T/C 13:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atisuto[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References don't seem to convey notability— LinkedIn profiles, trivial mentions, etc. Substantive discussion in reliable independent published sources looks like it is [still] lacking ( article was already deleted once). A loose necktie (talk) 07:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the sources more thoroughly, you'll see that most of them are very reliable secondary sources in Hebrew (Haaretz, Yisrael Hayom, Mako, etc.), and a single reliable news source in English. Ta,jhk (talk) 11:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non notable music production company. Celestina007 (talk) 07:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Not to delete - I disagree with the non-notable claim. I have no relation to this company or the people working in it, but it is a fact that Atisuto DJs are the most influential DJs in Israel; they actually could change the music style that will be played in public and private events in Israel (live concerts, festivals, weddings, etc.). In addition, they are the focus of multiple online articles in Hebrew, which were published in reliable and well-known Israeli news websites, such as Haaretz, Yisrael Hayom and Mako (also mentioned in a few reliable sources in English). --Ta,jhk (talk) 09:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That they couldChange the musical style in Israel, an opinion based on your personal knowledge, is not a reason to keep. DGG ( talk ) 20:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I disagree with the decision of deleting the article. I read and understand Hebrew fluently and from the different sources given, it is well broadcasted that Atisuto is a notable music company in Israel and that they contribute not a little to the the musical style in Israel. According to some international reliable sources, they are notable also abroad and not only in Israel. Thus, their notability and influence is not deduced from a personal knowledge but come from reliable sources.Mamscarlett123 (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 16:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability. One of the two keep votes above is from an account with two edits in mainspace that I am guessing was specifically created to comment at this AfD. so should be discounted. Number 5 7 11:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are two separate discussions here. One is personal against the users who argued not to delete the article, while the other focuses on notability. Referring to notability, it is important to take into consideration that some of the DJs listed in Atisuto are probably notable for themselves (I have read their interviews to leading news websites and it seems they are pretty famous in Israel, the United States and some countries in South America). Now, if an editor would create a separate Wikipedia article for each one of them, I would suggest merging them into a single article as they are part of a group. But this is exactly what happened in this case and that is why I vote to keep the article. Whitefact (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.